Posts Tagged ‘land rent’

Insights on Canberra’s Land Rent Bill

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008


Gavin Putland

The ACT’s Land Rent Act, with promised savings of 79% compared to the standard mortgage-based system of home ownership, took effect on July 1. This is an innovative housing affordability policy. Here’s what I wrote about it a week before it became law.

I make the following assumptions (which do not seem to be spelt out in the Bill):

  • that the capping of increases in rent will be apportioned to some measure of the general level of wages;
  • that a land rent lease will be granted without any up-front payment other than the first rent instalment;
  • that if a land rent lease is transferred, the transfer price (if any) will be included in the single price of the “house” or “home”;
  • that the proposed extension of the scheme to lessees on higher incomes will be accomplished by repealing or amending paragraph 5(2) of the Bill.

From my reading of the Bill, I understand as follows:
(more…)

The Rent of Italy

Monday, June 16th, 2008

A grasp of economic rent is vital to understanding geoism and the path to social justice and environmental sanity.

Short definitions are helpful but limited – the return to privilege; a free ride at society’s expense; unearned increment; excess profits that monopolists reap in the absence of competition; income derived from assets that cannot be freely produced by private economic agents; income (real or imputed) that cannot be justified as an incentive for private economic agents; or even the natural source of revenue for the community.

Sydney’s David Smiley continues his series wherein he fleshes out the meaning of rent through a string of vivid historical examples.

David Smiley

writes:
Most history books attempt to explain progress, poverty and conflict in terms of charismatic actors and political events, seldom in terms of fundamental causes. It is therefore refreshing to find, in A Traveller’s History of Italy (Lintner, V. 1989, Gloucestershire, Windrush Press), explanations in terms of land ownership.
(more…)

Don’t Shoot the Rabbits! We’ll need to eat them!!

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

maya

Robert J McAlpine, President Prosper Australia

The time for thinkers on economic matters has come! By neglecting the field of property valuation, mainstream economists have missed some of the most important factors in market price determination

There exists an almost complete chasm of two closely related economic considerations. One dealing with the abstract, which can vary between money market commentators – the other is concerned with the measurement of the market and its value in the marketplace. Each has developed contemporaneously but along separate and independent lines. Their origins were different, one – philosophical speculation, two - judicial and administrative necessity - land valuation backed by the land valuation courts.
(more…)

An Independent A.C.T Taxation Policy

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

This article was presented at a late 1980’s meeting prior to ACT self government and published in the Canberra Times.

Terry Dwyer

ACT finances will come from three sources - taxes, grants and borrowings. I do not propose to say much about borrowings because borrowings are not a source of current revenue. Australian Governments are generally coming to the realization that borrowing for current deficits is a dead-end road . The end comes when you have to flog whatever you can to pay your accumulated debts and you still can’t pay the housekeeping bills. Borrowing, other than for capital works which will repay principal and interest, is a shifty expedient in Government finance which is best avoided.

Turning to grants, much is clearly outside the ACT’s control. We do however need to point out firmly and clearly to the Grants Commission that there are features of the ACT which do reduce its taxable capacity in comparison to the States. Apart from the obvious National Capital functions and the ACT’s increasing service role for the South-East of NSW, there are other disabilities such as the high portion of exempt governmental or diplomatic activity here. Again the ACT suffers more than the States from the Federal monopoly of income tax because of the high proportion of higher income and two income households in Canberra. Many of Canberra’s fiscal disadvantages are well set out in the ACT submission to the Grants Commission.
(more…)