Using Georgist Insights to Make Sense of the World

During a recent e-news I pointed out how Georgist understandings help make sense of the world. I asked e-news readers (sign up in the right hand navigation bar, home page) to describe how they use knowledge of economic rents to decipher their world. The winner received a book – The Stewardship Economy. Paul Meleng was the winner and his piece ended up on p7 of the July – Sept 2012 Progress Magazine. Past Progress editions can be downloaded from our Digital Progress page. Here is Paul’s article:

Paul Meleng

My first profession was as a Licensed Land Surveyor. I trained in the Lands Department of WA and then contracted to Main Roads in the remote Kimberley. After a couple of years in mineral exploration work I set up my own wide ranging “practice” in a regional coastal centre, where I carried out complete design through to sale development projects for land owners. The whole land title and valuation system is studied and deeply understood as a core part of that profession.

After selling that regional business, I moved to the coast near Perth, and learned and worked in direct real estate sales, but this was during a deep price collapse after the 1982 bubble. My understanding of the psyche of property investment and the pain on the downside was deepened further as I presented ruthless offers to wiped out speculators on behalf of some hard money men.

I then learned the life insurance and superannuation game, expecting to do serious work, but once deep inside the beast, I found that it was just a rude scramble for commissions
which lead to bad warped advice. With my accountant buddy, I wrote a guide on how to survive it and still win. This sold 30,000 copies at $15 over the next decade while I built myself a grass roots financial advice business alongside his accounting practice.

I attempt to explain it to others this way:
We start with the common land or as a colony with “crown land”. We put pegs in the ground and create parcels of land and hand them out to favourites of the rulers as crown grants. The army of the king or republic stands behind the title.

With that as “security” and a good indication that one can make money from it over time, credit can be created. New money. A Bank can create money to represent the land’s “value” and put it into the landowner’s account which he can then use to get things happening and hopefully create enterprise.

Point 1:
Credit is not necessarily created by me having money that is loaned to you via a bank. It is created by the bank exactly as intended by the system as the monetisation of standing assets and the promise of labours and repayments to come. The loan secured by the privatised land creates the money, which you might say represents that land. The money does not start as someone else’s savings. One man’s debt is not really another man’s wealth.

So the simple message is that the level of private debt and confidence in long term employment really does matter, and that when private debt reaches a point where people are not willing or able to borrow and repay any more, then it stops dead in its tracks.

This is what is happening now. Australians have flipped from 1% net spenders to 10% net savers and the whole “buy now pay later” part of the economy is unravelling. I am now able to explain to younger clients how not to get caught.

Point 2:
The core Georgist story is about the equitable source of taxation that puts all the energies in the right direction. I do not talk to people about bringing in land tax. I suggest we never ever begin the subject that way. I talk to them about how utterly stupid and wasteful it is now, in this new world, to be using “income” as a basis for national revenue.

Young people who are global citizens and who do most of their business on the net can easily see how an entire parallel financial universe could bypass the old system and make it a joke.. They can also see how stupid it is to tax work and enterprise instead of one’s call upon the common wealth and services of the nation.

Once that discussion is illuminated, the question then arises as to the alternative. It is obvious. We defend the country and keep it safe and clean and operational in every way. It is a great privilege to be a citizen here. The more or less of it you use, the more or less of it you should pay. Exactly like shire land rates or body corporate levies. Land cannot be sent via cyberspace, parked in an offshore tax haven or undeclared. It is undeniably there. It is on Google Earth. You need it to stand on. It has title guaranteed and recorded by Government. It is already valued, professionally, for the purpose of local and state government revenues.

I say imagine that you could make a fortune as a global business or skilled worker and yet pay next to no tax by living very simply in Australia and taking up as little room as possible. Example. A software developer making millions in royalties could rent a room in my house and pay one quarter of my total government contribution. He can bank the rest or use it to employ and train more people and expand his global IT empire. If we replaced income tax with land rent, our country would be a magnet for all the best and brightest entrepreneurs and skill workers in the world who were happy to live lightly on the earth. Just exactly what we want.

The best way to play the system would be to make as much as possible while having the smallest “footprint” possible. It would be to use your patch of dirt far more productively than the average similar patch of dirt in your area as they would all be valued and taxed a similar amount. Just exactly what we want.

All of the complexity in superannuation would be reduced to something that made sense to the average worker. Super should be about a high level of security and regulatory safeguards of people’s retirement funding and not all about the tax concessions. There would still be plenty of good work for the accounting clerks to do. Probably 100,000 good legal, accounting and clerical workers could be switched to useful work from mindless income tax compliance, or detailed finangling avoidance. Truth in accounting would be driven by a market that desires accurate valuation and accountability of businesses for the reasons of business rather than endless games with the ATO daleks.

No income tax. No payroll tax, company tax, superannuation tax, GST and no need to argue deductions. Goodness me. Ordinary hard workers might even be capable once more of running their own small business with just a cash book. I find that people do get it. Their response is then: “You are right, but THEY will never allow it to happen”… I think with wisdom, persistence, tact, and a sprinkle of wry humour, we can do something about that.


  1. John Jamieson06-11-2012

    This article by Paul Meleng is an excellent one and embraces how an ethical financial adviser can offer the Geoist insights to those who are now in “the digital age” of communications and want to live a life in which their world is governed by the need to make a living at the coal-face of evolving electronic systems, but there is the matter of the creation of “credit” and how the international banking cartel is keeping its control over the global population by giving itself the sole right of creating the money supply (credit) as its God-given “special arrangement” ignoring the fact that those that are governed by an elected democratic body of people should reserve the right to how they manage their credit, or money supply as was the case when the United States of America broke free of the old British Empire and established its right to create its own credit.
    Australia, shortly after Federation in the early 1900’s also had control over its money supply, or credit, through the people’s bank The Commonwaelth Bank of Australia and its understudies, the various State Banks. Read the history of the CBA and how the international banking cartel made sure it and the various State Banks were driven into insolvency and wiped out – their gutted “shells” then used by the new owners, the international private banks, as massive tax losses where they could further invade Australia and ensure we all became slaves of debt in perpetuity. The Geoist approach must be implemented in conjunction with a National Bank of Australia, modelled on the CBA which was finally sold off by the Hawke-Keating Labor government. Unfortunately nobody seems to listen to the enlightened advisors such as Dr Ken Henry or bother to understand history.

  2. Chris Polis06-11-2012

    Great article. I suspect the last line; that ‘wisdom, persistence, tact and humour’ are required is not nearly as appreciated as it needs to be.

  3. Paul Meleng23-11-2012

    Thanks for the comments John and Chris. Yes Chris , it is all in the great old book by Dale Carnegie, How to Win Friends and Influence People. You could summarise it as “arguing and head butting does not work”. The founder of Re-evaluation Co-counselling, Harvey Jackins said that when surrounded by confused thinking and distress the thing to do is to put forward a rational solution as clearly as possible and without rancour or insult to any. Just keep re stating it clearly and calmly and eventually, one by one, more and more people will be able to hear and understand.

    A comment I would like to add re current economics is that no one seems to notice the irony of a conservative economic vision that wants more young people to borrow more for a “housing recovery” and yet at the same time demands more “flexibility” ( ie less security) from the Australian workforce and while sending as many jobs as they can offshore. It beats me how the same economy can have both !

    Another puzzling one is wanting a flexible workforce but of people who take out mortgages on houses where State Governments charge around $20,000 in stamp duty on the conveyance of the median house. I wonder how many of the cars clogging the freeways are people driving from one side of the city where they set up house to the other side where they now work. Doing the long commute rather than find $20,000 plus agent fees and moving costs to live in a house no better than the one they are in, or downgrading by $40,000.

    It is amazing the silly stuff that people will put up with.

  4. Surveying Perth30-01-2013

    Excellent article Paul, he completely deserves the award. Thank god that after learning the insurance business, he didn’t moved to that profession rather preferred; great decision better to say perfect decision.

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.