Should we charge Land for vagrancy?
They name to shame the Savoy Tavern on Spencer Street, the Argus building on Latrobe Street and bare land at 567 Collins Street as examples of developer-owned blight.
Councillors loathe these freeloaders, and you should too. Vacant or derelict sites diminish civic activity and amenity. Rather than put them to their best and highest use, the landowners prefer to leave them unused in the hope of rezoning or better times ahead.
This landowner abuse isn’t academic – it kills people. Three young people died on 28 March 2013 when a poorly supported wall on Grocon’s long vacant land at Victoria and Swanston Streets collapsed onto the footpath.
The Age thundered: “The loss of three lives has raised questions about how a prized city site could have been left to wither over almost thirty years – and about the dangers that come with such neglect.”
Local government is pressured to give in to developer demands by the obvious neglect and neighboring properties are tainted by adjoining carelessness.
The MCC already charges differential rates: 3.9 per cent of the Net Annual Valuation of residential property and 4.6 per cent on non-residential. The key element is the NAV. This is five per cent of the capital value of residential properties and the annual rent of commercial properties.
The unused Savoy, the asbestos-riddled Argus and vacant 567 Collins Street would be deemed to generate minimal rent and pay very little in rates, hence the councillor anger.
There is a better way – Site Value Rating, which is based on the market value of the land. The Savoy and the Argus would pay as much in rates as the 30 story building next door. Their civic blight would simply vanish as the owner scrambled to put them to good use. Too late for the three dead students. The removal of similar hazards elsewhere cannot happen soon enough.
This is not rocket science. Just do it, MCC.