Repeal Stamp Duty!

Sign the petition

The Victorian Government should remove stamp duty from the sale of property to increase housing affordability, support first home buyers and give the economy a much needed boost according to the Stamp Out Stamp Duty Campaign.

The Stamp Out Stamp Duty campaign calls on the Baillieu Government and Treasurer Kim Wells to heed the advice of their own departments and scrap stamp duty in favour of a small value based land tax on residential property. The proposal is revenue neutral.

Campaign spokesperson David Collyer said that stamp duty created an unnecessary barrier for first home buyers and was an economic dampener which prevented easy property transfers and best use by owners.

“First home buyers are hit with a huge tax at the same moment they take on a giant mortgage debt. Stamp Duty also takes advantage of people forced to sell due to the death of a family member, illness, unemployment, family breakdown or a change in circumstances. It’s an unfair and poorly targeted tax that serves no real economic purpose.

“Stamp duty also adds around $25,000 to the cost of an average block of land, which just makes already expensive properties even more expensive.”

To make up the lost revenue from stamp duty, a small efficient value based land tax should be introduced, a proposal supported by leading economists such as Dr Ken Henry and the Victorian Department of Treasury and Finance.

Mr Collyer said “Victoria already has a State Land Tax, however owner-occupied properties are exempt at the moment. We are calling for this tax to be extended to residential properties with appropriate measures to safeguard community housing and those who have recently paid stamp duty from an unfair burden.”

“This change would provide a genuine spur to development on high-value land and reduce the pressure for more urban sprawl. Both the supply and affordability of rental housing would be boosted as a broader land tax base would put landlords and home owners on an equal footing. For the vast majority of Melbournians, this change would lead to a net cost saving.”

Economic modelling of this key recommendation of the Henry Review by Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute shows landowners in Melbourne, Port Philip Boroondara, Bayside, Stonnington and Yarra municipal areas would overall pay more while the vast majority of homeowners elsewhere would pay considerably less.

“For too long discussion on tax reform has been stifled by vested interests. We now have quality economic modelling that shows wealthy landowners benefit most from Victoria’s very bad tax system.

“This modest change would galvanise economic activity in Victoria, something the Baillieu government – and every Victorian government before them – proclaim loud and long is a key objective,” Collyer concluded.

Sign the petition

Stamp Out Stamp Duty facebook page


Media contact: David Collyer

About Prosper: Prosper Australia is a tax reform lobby group and think tank that is now 120 years old. It seeks to move the base of government revenues from taxing individuals and enterprise to capturing the economic rents of the natural endowment, notably through Land Value Tax and Mining Tax.


  1. Peter Fraser26-04-2012

    A good cause I will support David.

    Email me if you ever wish to debate other issues which I don’t support.

  2. Elias26-04-2012

    If you ever wish to comment on issues in which there is the potential for dissenting views & passionate rebuttal, then don’t post on internet forums, PF. That is the zeitgeist.

  3. michael francis26-04-2012

    The Baillieu family, of which our Premier, Ted,is a member, have made their fortunes from land deals over the last 100 years.

    The ‘family’ own blue chip properties from Portsea, Toorak all the way to Lizard Island, Qld.

    Remember the global Real Estate Company, Baillieu, Knight, Frank.

    Good luck expecting a Baillieu to muzzle the jackals and hyenas that represent our Real Estate Industry.

  4. michael01-05-2012

    Not good news if you have already brought a house and paid stamp duty now land tax as well

  5. Paul Meleng08-05-2012

    Michael, you are right. But hang on , the proposal agrees with you saying to make allowance for having paid that stamp duty. So it applies to future buys. Have to start somewhere.

    I wonder how much it would save in travel time and fuel if the cost of buying and selling was minimised in favour of pay as you go rates. How many people change jobs and drive across town or catch two trains each way to commute to another job because of the $25,000 PLUS real estate commission cost of shifting.
    Now there is a study worthy of the Dept of Transport and others.

  6. Mik20-03-2013

    A land tax would just hurt renters as the owners of the properties will just pass the tax on, the renter will find it harder to save money to buy a property. I would be in favour of a 50% reduction of Stamp Duty and a high land tax on undeveloped land (not farms) and blocks of land that are sitting around with no house on them. give the owners a 2 year grace period then tax them. this would help stop land banking and artificially increasing land for housing.

  7. David Collyer21-03-2013

    Mik, the assertion that renters would pay a landowner’s land tax is incorrect. Renters already pay market rents. A landowner cannot pass their land tax on any more than he can pass on the cost of his daughter’s ballet lessons.

    All tenanted properties in Victoria are already liable for State Land Tax and have been for decades. And no, they don’t pay SLT, unless the lease is commercial and the tenant has foolishly allowed herself to be bludgeoned into paying someone else’s bills.

Leave a Reply


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.